Hi Joe,
Just want to say thank you for making my life so much easier. What do personally think about this diamond, great steal?
https://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/2.28-carat-f-color-vs2-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-10103189
or do you think these are a better option?
https://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/2.50-carat-f-color-si1-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-9868999
https://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/2.50-carat-e-color-si1-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-10160424
Again, appreciate this website, its GREAT!
Thanks!
Both 9868999 or 10160424 have black crystals right in the middle of the table. I think the 2.5 F SI1 below would be better in terms of inclusions – the twinning wisps are 0.06mm wide in real size terms and harder to see than a black crystal.
The 2.28 F VS2 also has a black crystal, although it’s smaller. For the same price, I’d rather hit 2.5ct with 10016469.
Shape,Carat,Color,Clarity,Cut,Price (USD),Affiliate Link
Round,2.5,F,SI1,Excellent,26780,https://www.diamondscreener.com/ja/loose-diamonds/round-cut/2.50-carat-f-color-si1-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-10016469
The 2.13 F SI1 isn’t quite as clean as the 2.5 F SI1 – there’s more than just the twinning wisps going on there. The diamonds below are cleaner and have better optical symmetry, but are a bit more expensive.
Shape,Carat,Color,Clarity,Cut,Price (USD),Affiliate Link
Round,2.01,G,VS2,Excellent,23280,https://www.diamondscreener.com/ja/loose-diamonds/round-cut/2.01-carat-g-color-vs2-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-10446029
Round,2.03,F,SI1,Excellent,24250,https://www.diamondscreener.com/ja/loose-diamonds/round-cut/2.03-carat-f-color-si1-clarity-true-hearts-cut-sku-9028748
Thanks, I was thinking a little harder and do you think this diamond would probably be a little too big for a size 4 ring? Is there any other good ones you found for a smaller ct size?